Skip to content

15 - Next-Level Expansion Plan (Decision Locked)

Home: README

This document converts your answers into an implementation-ready expansion plan.

Decision lock (from your answers)

  1. Audience: both internal and external learners.
  2. Language: English only.
  3. Delivery format: documentation-first curriculum with linked external resources only.
  4. Assessment model (recommended): weighted scoring with minimum floor per competency.
  5. Certification: both informal badges and internal non-accredited certification track.
  6. Mentoring model: self-paced by default, mentor-assisted optional.
  7. Accessibility (recommended): baseline now, full accessibility program phased in quarterly.
  8. Progress tracking: manual, docs-based progress logs and checkpoint notes (no app required).
  9. Update cadence: quarterly.
  10. Governance owner: (curriculum maintainer).
  11. CI automation (recommended): yes, enabled.
  12. Data policy: both anonymized real examples and mock data.
  13. SME definition: best-in-class practical standard (operational + engineering + teaching).
  14. Maintenance budget (recommended): 2 hours/week + 1 quarterly deep review.
  15. Priority: all levels are priority; execution will be parallelized with quality gates.

Recommendations you asked for

Assessment strictness recommendation

Use weighted scoring with pass floors. - Why: pass/fail hides weak areas; weighted scoring exposes where support is needed. - Model: - Practical execution: 35% - Debugging and failure recovery: 20% - Engineering quality (tests, logging, structure): 20% - Communication/teach-back: 15% - Operational thinking (runbooks, risk controls): 10% - Pass criteria: - Overall score >= 80/100 - No core domain below 70

Accessibility recommendation

Implement in two waves. - Wave 1 (now): practical baseline - plain-language alternatives, - keyboard-first navigation guidance, - high-contrast/readability checks, - consistent heading hierarchy, - no image-only critical instructions. - Wave 2 (quarterly roadmap): full program - optional external captioned resources linked in curriculum, - alternate format packs (printable/offline), - explicit reading-level tracks.

CI recommendation

Enable CI now with: - markdown relative-link integrity checks, - project smoke checks, - quick checks on push/PR, - full smoke on quarterly schedule + manual trigger.

Maintenance recommendation

  • Weekly: 2 hours
  • 60 min content fixes,
  • 30 min link/quality maintenance,
  • 30 min progress-log review and curriculum tuning notes.
  • Quarterly: 6-hour hardening sprint
  • rubric updates,
  • remediation updates,
  • full smoke + curriculum release notes.

Mentoring recommendation

  • Keep self-paced as the default workflow.
  • Add optional mentor check-ins as needed (recommended cadence: 30-45 minutes biweekly when active help is needed).
  • Do not require mentors to complete the plan.

SME standard (operational definition)

A learner is "SME-ready" when they can reliably: 1. Design and ship idempotent automations with safe reruns. 2. Build and maintain SQL reporting pipelines with quality controls. 3. Integrate external API data into stable cache/reporting layers. 4. Deliver browser-usable dashboards for non-technical stakeholders. 5. Diagnose, recover, and explain failures clearly. 6. Mentor others using clear reasoning and reproducible examples.

Next-level architecture

  1. Personalization engine
  2. learner profile intake,
  3. placement scoring,

  4. pace recommendations.

  5. Multi-lane learning delivery

  6. Explain lane,
  7. Show lane,
  8. Do lane,

  9. Teach lane.

  10. Scored competency system

  11. entry checks,
  12. level exit checks,
  13. capstone readiness score,

  14. badge/certification map.

  15. Remediation and acceleration tracks

  16. failure-pattern-based recovery paths,

  17. optional challenge packs.

  18. Mentor operations

  19. mentor runbooks,
  20. review scripts,

  21. escalation triggers.

  22. Content governance and release operations

  23. versioned curriculum updates,
  24. owner approvals,
  25. quarterly release notes.

Execution roadmap

Quarter 1

  • Complete docs 16-20 in full.
  • Roll out CI checks and maintenance workflow.
  • Add profile intake and placement recommendations.
  • Add scoring rubrics and certification track definitions.

Quarter 2

  • Add remediation packs and mentor guide workflows.
  • Add integration simulation packs (API/SQL failure drills).
  • Expand linked external resources by skill level and topic.

Quarter 3

  • Expand accessibility (readability variants and alternate format packs).
  • Expand manual progress analytics templates (no app dependency).
  • Add advanced challenge packs for levels 8-10.

Quarter 4

  • Full curriculum hardening and quality audit.
  • Publish annual versioned curriculum release.

Success metrics

  • Day-1 completion rate.
  • Level progression rate.
  • Time-to-first-working-project.
  • Failure recovery time.
  • Capstone pass rates by competency area.
  • Mentor intervention frequency.

Non-goals (explicit)

  • No requirement to build a learning web app.
  • No requirement to host or transcribe video content in this repo.
  • No requirement to collect automated personal telemetry data.

Risks and controls

  • Risk: content overload.
  • Control: dual path (quick path + deep path).
  • Risk: quality drift.
  • Control: CI + quarterly release process.
  • Risk: uneven level quality.
  • Control: same quality gates for levels 0-10.

Primary Sources

Optional Resources

Next

Next: curriculum/16_LEARNER_PROFILE_AND_PLACEMENT.md →